Defected Composite Laminates Assessment Using C-Scan Technique

Authors

  • Rashid Abdulsalam Materials Science Department - Oil Technology Author

Keywords:

Ultrasound, delamination, composite materials

Abstract

Traditional ultrasound methods are quently used to detect separation in composites, but cutting-edge techniques have recently revealed matrix faults in straightforward tension-loaded coupon models. The present study aims to investigate separations with matrix splitting resulting from minimum-energy impacts on quasi-isotropic carbon/polyetheretherketone laminates using a range of pulse-echo methods. Traditional amplitude and time-of-flight separations are detected using C-scans at right angle incidence, whereas matrix fractures through the thickness of the laminate may be detected using C-scans with the transducer angled to the laminate axis. Some findings of ultrasound test of affected carbon-fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone specimens were described in this work, and they are contrasted with X-ray results to demonstrate the effectiveness of the suggested inspection approach.

 

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Richardson, M. O. W., & Wisheart, M. J. (1996). Review of low-velocity impact properties of composite materials. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 27(12), 1123-1131.

2. Mahesh, V., Joladarashi, S., & Kulkarni, S. M. (2021). A comprehensive review on material selection for polymer matrix composites subjected to impact load. Defence Technology, 17(1), 257-277.

3. Chen, D., Luo, Q., Meng, M., Li, Q., & Sun, G. (2019). Low velocity impact behavior of interlayer hybrid composite laminates with carbon/glass/basalt fibres. Composites Part B: Engineering, 176, 107191.

4. Chai, G. B., & Manikandan, P. (2014). Low velocity impact response of fibre-metal laminates–A review. Composite Structures, 107, 363-381.

5. Belingardi, G., & Vadori, R. (2002). Low velocity impact tests of laminate glass-fiber-epoxy matrix composite material plates. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 27(2), 213-229.

6. Reyes, G., & Sharma, U. (2010). Modeling and damage repair of woven thermoplastic composites subjected to low velocity impact. Composite Structures, 92(2), 523-531.

7. Kim, J. K. (2000). Recent developments in impact damage assessment of fibre composites. Impact behaviour of fibre-reinforced composite materials and structures, 33.

8. Zhang, Q., Zhang, J., & Wu, L. (2018). Impact and energy absorption of long fiber-reinforced thermoplastic based on two-phase modeling and experiments. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 122, 374-383.

9. Wang, B., Zhong, S., Lee, T. L., Fancey, K. S., & Mi, J. (2020). Non-destructive testing and evaluation of composite materials/structures: A state-of-the-art review. Advances in mechanical engineering, 12(4), 1687814020913761.

10. Ryu, C. H., Park, S. H., Kim, D. H., Jhang, K. Y., & Kim, H. S. (2016). Nondestructive evaluation of hidden multi-delamination in a glass-fiber-reinforced plastic composite using terahertz spectroscopy. Composite Structures, 156, 338-347.

11. Saito, H., Morita, M., Kawabe, K., Kanesaki, M., Takeuchi, H., Tanaka, M., & Kimpara, I. (2011). Effect of ply-thickness on impact damage morphology in CFRP laminates. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 30(13), 1097-1106.

12. Quaresimin, M., Ricotta, M., Martello, L., & Mian, S. (2013). Energy absorption in composite laminates under impact loading. Composites Part B: Engineering, 44(1), 133-140.

13. Gerlach, R., Siviour, C. R., Wiegand, J., & Petrinic, N. (2012). In-plane and through-thickness properties, failure modes, damage and delamination in 3D woven carbon fibre composites subjected to impact loading. Composites Science and Technology, 72(3), 397-411.

14. Zhu, D., Gencoglu, M., & Mobasher, B. (2009). Low velocity flexural impact behavior of AR glass fabric reinforced cement composites. Cement and Concrete Composites, 31(6), 379-387.

15. Aslan, Z., Karakuzu, R., & Okutan, B. (2003). The response of laminated composite plates under low-velocity impact loading. Composite structures, 59(1), 119-127.

16. Gholizadeh, S. (2016). A review of non-destructive testing methods of composite materials. Procedia structural integrity, 1, 50-57.

17. Capriotti, M., Kim, H. E., Lanza di Scalea, F., & Kim, H. (2017). Non-Destructive inspection of impact damage in composite aircraft panels by ultrasonic guided waves and statistical processing. Materials, 10(6), 616.

18. Karthik, M. K., & Kumar, C. S. (2022). A comprehensive review on damage characterization in polymer composite laminates using acoustic emission monitoring. Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing, 58(8), 705-721.

19. Lizaranzu, M., Lario, A., Chiminelli, A., & Amenabar, I. (2015). Non-destructive testing of composite materials by means of active thermography-based tools. Infrared Physics & Technology, 71, 113-120.

20. Furrow, A. P. C., Dillard, D. A., Clair, T. L. S., & Hinkley, J. (1998). Dye penetrant induced micro cracking in high performance thermoplastic polyimide composites. Journal of composite materials, 32(1), 31-48.

21. Senck, S., Scheerer, M., Revol, V., Dobes, K., Plank, B., & Kastner, J. (2017). Non-destructive evaluation of defects in polymer matrix composites for aerospace applications using X-ray Talbot-Lau interferometry and micro CT. In 58th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference (p. 0355).

22. Djordjevic, B. B. (2009, September). Ultrasonic characterization of advanced composite materials. In the 10th International Conference of the Slovenian Society for Non-Destructive Testing (Application of Contemporary Non-Destructive Testing in Engineering), Ljubljana, Slovenia (pp. 47-57).

23. Nesvijski, E. G. (2000). Some aspects of ultrasonic testing of composites. Composite Structures, 48(1-3), 151-155.

24. McRae, K. I., McCray, A. G., Russell, A. J., & Bowers, C. P. (1992). Ultrasonic imaging of delamination damage around fastener holes in a graphite/epoxy composite. Damage detection in composite materials, ASTM STP, 1128, 163-79.

25. Kinra, V. K., Ganpatye, A. S., & Maslov, K. (2006). Ultrasonic ply-by-ply detection of matrix cracks in laminated composites. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 25, 37-49.

26. Sollars, J., Wertz, J., & Aldrin, J. C. (2023, July). Compact Functional Material Wedge for Oblique Angle Ultrasound. In 49th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (Vol. 86595, p. V001T01A001). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

27. Welter, J. T. (2019). Oblique angle pulse-echo ultrasound characterization of barely visible impact damage in polymer matrix composites. University of Dayton.

28. Miao, H., Wu, Z., Ying, Z., & Hu, X. (2019). The numerical and experimental investigation on low-velocity impact response of composite panels: Effect of fabric architecture. Composite Structures, 227, 111343.

29. Miller, J. G. (1984). Non-destructive evaluation of composite materials using ultrasound (No. NASA-CR-173416).

30. Taheri, H. (2014). Utilization of Non-destructive Testing (NDT) Methods for Composite Materials Inspection (Phased Array Ultrasonic).

31. Fahr, A. (1992). Ultrasonic C-scan inspection of composite materials.

32. Kas, Y. O., & Kaynak, C. (2005). Ultrasonic (C-scan) and microscopic evaluation of resin transfer molded epoxy composite plates. Polymer Testing, 24(1), 114-120.

33. Aymerich, F., & Meili, S. (2000). Ultrasonic evaluation of matrix damage in impacted composite laminates. Composites Part B: Engineering, 31(1), 1-6.

34. Ellison, A., & Kim, H. (2020). Shadowed delamination area estimation in ultrasonic C-scans of impacted composites validated by X-ray CT. Journal of Composite Materials, 54(4), 549-561.

35. Katunin, A., Wronkowicz-Katunin, A., & Dragan, K. (2020). Impact damage evaluation in composite structures based on fusion of results of ultrasonic testing and X-ray computed tomography. Sensors, 20(7), 1867.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Defected Composite Laminates Assessment Using C-Scan Technique. (2025). Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 25(1), 39-56. https://jbas.lafsrj.ly/index.php/JBAS/article/view/50

Similar Articles

11-13 of 13

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.